Another claim that constituencies had 836 more votes than recorded ignored the fact that the records of some 3,600 voters, such as abused spouses and police officers, are not made public for reasons of security. And an implication that 5,295 Maricopa County voters may have voted twice because residents of other counties had the same names and birth years has been verified by county officials and found to be unfounded; the foreigners were in fact other people.
With similar exams now scheduled for Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Texas, it’s increasingly clear that Arizona’s partisan exam passed when it failed – amplifying baseless talking points at all. by failing in any way to substantiate Mr. Trump’s claims of a rigged election.
Arizona-style journals in other states appear to be following the same scenario with the blessing of the Republican political leaders who promote them, said Nate Persily, Stanford University law professor, election expert and law scholar. democracy.
“For those who push the fraud account, the real truth is irrelevant,” he said. âThe idea that the election was stolen becomes a belief that defines the tribe. It’s not about proving anything at this point. It is about showing loyalty to a particular description of reality.
Indeed, following Cyber ââNinjas’ initial report, Republicans in the Pennsylvania Senate have only strengthened their resolve to move forward with an election review, which includes a request for license numbers from lead and partial Social Security numbers of the Seven Million Voters of Pennsylvania.
“The historic audit in Maricopa County has been completed and important findings have been brought to light,” State Senator Doug Mastriano, a Republican and main supporter of the election review, said in a statement last week. . âIf these types of issues were discovered in Maricopa County, imagine what could be brought to light by a full forensic audit in other counties in the United States that processed massive amounts of mail-in ballots. “
On Friday, Robin Vos, President of the Wisconsin Assembly, signed several subpoenas issued to the head of the Election Commission in Milwaukee, the largest city in the state and home to the largest concentration of Democratic voters, with a substantial demand for documents, including communication between the city and the electoral boards of the ‘State.