Republicans had principles after Watergate. What changed?


Regarding “Editorial: The Healing Will Not Happen. Truth? That’s all we can hope for for the anniversary of January 6 ”(December 6): The first anniversary of January 6 made me think that Watergate may well represent the heyday of our democracy. The country was then mesmerized by the Watergate hearings and by learning of Nixon’s involvement in a cover-up as well as charges of obstruction of justice, abuse of power and defiance of subpoenas. of the committee. No one, including the president, has been judged above the law and his actions have had serious consequences. Republicans and Democrats worked closely to get the truth, not to hide, redirect or deny what had happened. Barry Goldwater, a staunch Conservative, and another senator visited Nixon at the White House tell him he has to resign. It was the principles and the Constitution on party loyalty and power. The system worked as expected. What has changed so much that an attack on Capitol Hill meets with an almost muffled response from one party? Political scientists, historians, sociologists, and even psychologists will most certainly examine how, in 50 years, we have come to a place where conservatives can somehow justify or at least tolerate an attack on our nation’s Capitol.

William Mirsky, Houston

Shame on the GOP leaders and those who support them for their absence on Capitol Hill to commemorate the Jan. 6 uprising, and for their abject failure to acknowledge it for the terrible attack on our democracy that it was. There are no words to express how sad, disappointed and, yes, angry I feel. Don’t tell me you’re acting for the good of the United States or for the common good.

Maris P. Helfrich, Galveston

All of this criticism of politicians’ eagerness to continue lying about the election is pointless. The real culprit is our system of primaries. Most of the people who vote in the primaries come from the extreme wings of both parties. Unfortunately, politicians are forced to pamper them in order to survive. If everyone who votes in the general election voted in the primary, we wouldn’t end up with such extremism.

Imtiaz Munshi, land of sugar

We all saw it on TV a year ago. It was an attack on our Capitol that disrupted what has always been a peaceful transfer of power in our country. The Republicans who downplayed him are just cowards.

Patrick Cooney, Cypress

The media coverage of the January 6 atrocity on its first anniversary was truly a public service. It reminded us of the hypocrisy and betrayal of those who participated, of those who inspired violence and of those who claim that the participants were “all good people” behaving like “normal tourists”. I see no mention of fines to be paid for restoring what they broke, plus the cost of finding them, bringing them to justice, and supporting them during their pitifully short prison terms. They were all accomplices, so they should all be held accountable for the crimes and the expenses. Why should the majority of the citizens of our democracy pay for the folly of a few?

Page S Williams, Houston

Thinking about your coverage of the January 6 attack yesterday, I remembered that over a century and a half ago another, more terrible insurrection had taken place, the instigators of which also fought. to preserve a particular way of life. Yet neither a strong faith in God, nor a passionate belief in what their politicians told them, gave them the power to preserve racial inequality, white supremacy, or the culture it was based on. My prayer, as we reflect on our most recent uprising, is that we do not forget the lessons of the Civil War, or have to go through such horrors again.

Michael Terlouw, Houston

For some Americans, those who stormed the Capitol are patriots or were all peaceful protesters who casually strolled around the rotunda. For others, it was insurgents who attacked American democracy by trying to overthrow the will of American voters. It is political bias that allows such divergent views of reality. Our views on situations should not vary depending on which end of the political spectrum the issue is at. Any insurrectionist who uses force to storm our Capitol is a vigilante who has committed a crime, regardless of the political party he supports. The survey should not be whitewashed. It is very important that we hold those who planned and executed this event accountable to ensure that it never happens again.

Rick Abegg, Conroe

Good luck (and storeroom)

Regarding “Biden is reviving the appointment of Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez to lead ICE,” For someone who shamelessly trashed ICE and refused uncompromisingly to cooperate with them to arrest, jail and prosecute immigrants entering here illegally, good luck. Your hypocrisy won’t serve you well in your confirmation process, Sheriff.

Mike Gonzales, Houston


Regarding “Opinion: 5 Lessons Houston Startups and Investors Can Learn from the Conviction of Elizabeth Holmes” (January 5): it is astonishing to me that Elizabeth Holmes can be found guilty of defrauding investors about blood analyzers, while corporate executives directly implicated in the massive harm to patients caused by the fraudulent sale of opioids have never been personally convicted of a crime. Does this difference represent “investors versus patients?” “

John T. James, Houston

Walter Ulrich’s teachings on the Elizabeth Holmes affair underscore the sad fact that everyone at some point has been duped to some extent by a charismatic charlatan. While a number of “unicorn” vendors have hinted that they will be the next Steve Jobs, none have embodied both his PT Barnum style and Thomas Edison class substance.

J. Reynolds, Houston


About Author

Comments are closed.